<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Story Dynamics - Stories &#187; Professional standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.storydynamics.com/Stories/category/contest-themes/professional-standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.storydynamics.com/Stories</link>
	<description>Stories, Newsletters, and Story-Contests</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:40:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Would standards ruin storytelling?</title>
		<link>http://www.storydynamics.com/Stories/2007/08/09/would-standards-ruin-storytelling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.storydynamics.com/Stories/2007/08/09/would-standards-ruin-storytelling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 11:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Lipman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contest Themes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsletters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.storydynamics.com/Stories/2007/08/09/would-standards-ruin-storytelling/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you want to get storytellers arguing, just mention &#8220;standards.&#8221; Some people claim that storytelling is suffering for lack of performance standards; others say it will suffer even more if we have standards.I&#8217;m not even talking about what is a suitable story or how to tell it. Rather, I&#8217;m talking here about PROFESSIONAL standards: how [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to get storytellers arguing, just mention &#8220;standards.&#8221; Some people claim that storytelling is suffering for lack of performance standards; others say it will suffer even more if we have standards.<P>I&#8217;m not even talking about what is a suitable story or how to tell it. Rather, I&#8217;m talking here about PROFESSIONAL standards: how we relate to those who engage us to tell stories, and to our listeners, students, etc.
<p>This issue applies to performers, of course, but it also applies to story-educators, story-trainers, consultants in organizations, coaches, etc. <P> Are there values we don&#8217;t want to compromise?<br />
<h3>I said, &#8220;No!&#8221;</h3>
<p>I have opposed such discussions in the past. Why? Well, storytelling can&#8217;t be derived from standards. It comes from imagery, not from principles. <P> If you instruct people in the &#8220;principles of storytelling,&#8221; for example, you tend to get bad storytelling results. After all, if you didn&#8217;t know how to walk, suppose someone tried to teach you by saying, &#8220;Walking is just a controlled fall from one leg to the other.&#8221; That&#8217;s a true statement, but would it help you? Has anyone ever learned to walk from knowing that principle? <P> On the contrary, the strength of storytelling is that, in a society where we sometimes trust analytic thinking too much, storytelling can help put us back in touch with the value of experience. It can free us from our over-dependence on &#8220;standards.&#8221; <P> To make matters worse, to most storytellers the word &#8220;standards&#8221; suggests something prescriptive, judgemental, inflexible, and exclusionary. <P> So why would we need professional standards? Is there possibly a way to create them that doesn&#8217;t have these negative effects?<br />
<h3>Karen&#8217;s Patience</h3>
<p>Karen Dietz, former executive director of the National Storytelling Network and new chair of its Storytelling in Organizations special interest group  (http://www.storytellinginorganizations.com) was kind enough to spend an hour on the phone with me, explaining why she thought this was not only a good idea, but an important one. <P> She said, &#8220;Look, Doug. We each <strong>have</strong> standards (or principles or values, whatever you want to call them). We don&#8217;t always know we have them, though. But as soon as someone violates our values, we think, &#8216;Wait a minute!&#8217; <P> &#8220;But what happens then?&#8221; she continued. &#8220;If it&#8217;s just our personal point of view against the attitude of the person who has hired us, we&#8217;re at a great disadvantage trying to stand up for our principles. <P> &#8220;But imagine this: What if we had a list of those values that we, as a community, all happened to agree on? <P> &#8220;Then,&#8221; she went on, &#8220;we could say to an organizer or employer, &#8216;What you just asked me to do violates a commonly held principle of the National Storytelling Network!&#8217; That would make it easier to insist, since others would have supported my point of view.&#8221; <P> I said, &#8220;Sure, Karen, I&#8217;d like a whole community behind me. But who would come up with these standards? Wouldn&#8217;t the result be elitist and exclusionary?&#8221; <P> She said, &#8220;No, Doug. I&#8217;m not talking &#8216;top-down&#8217; here. We need to <strong>find</strong> the values we already have. If each of us looks for the values we <strong>do</strong> hold, then we can search for the ones we have in common. <P> &#8220;I hope we will have a public discussion on which principles really represent our community. Even if there are only 3 or 4 values we agree on, it would be wonderful to know that we all agree on those.&#8221;<br />
<h3>The Dark Side of Storytelling</h3>
<p>I realized, once I had talked to Karen, that it was an important value to me that &#8220;stories must not be used to hide the truth.&#8221; I had never put that idea together with the word &#8220;standard.&#8221; <P>But one day I arrived at a conference where I had been hired to tell stories about the proceedings. Once I got there, though, I learned that an important part of the truth about the conference subject was considered &#8220;off limits&#8221; for stories. I thought, &#8220;Foul!&#8221;<P>But what was the foul line that had been crossed? I had never articulated or defended my unconsciously held value about not telling stories that lie through omission. As a result, I was unprepared to deal with it. If I had thought about it in advance, I would have handled that situation better.<br />
<h3>Important for all of us?</h3>
<p>Karen was talking mostly about the story work some of us do in businesses and other organizations. But I think the problem applies to <strong>all</strong> the work that storytellers do. <P>I want to begin thinking, for myself at least, what my standards are. And I&#8217;d love to hear some of yours. </p>
<p><em>This is issue #75 of &#8220;<a href="http://www.storydynamics.com/etips" target="_blank">eTips from the Storytelling Coach</a>&#8221; You can sign up for your <a href="http://www.storydynamics.com/etips" target="_blank">free monthly subscription</a> (complete with money-saving subscriber specials and announcements) in the upper right corner of this page.</em></p>
<div id="st0000000001" class="st-taf"><script src="http://taf.socialtwist.com:80/taf/js/shoppr.core.js?id=0000000001"></script><img style="border:0;margin:0;padding:0;" src="http://tellafriend.socialtwist.com:80/wizard/images/tafbutton_blue16.png" onmouseout="hideHoverMap(this)" onmouseover="showHoverMap(this, '0000000001', 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.storydynamics.com%2FStories%2F2007%2F08%2F09%2Fwould-standards-ruin-storytelling%2F', 'Would+standards+ruin+storytelling%3F')" onclick="cw(this, {id:'0000000001',link: 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.storydynamics.com%2FStories%2F2007%2F08%2F09%2Fwould-standards-ruin-storytelling%2F', title: '+Would+standards+ruin+storytelling%3F+' })"/></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.storydynamics.com/Stories/2007/08/09/would-standards-ruin-storytelling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

